Tuesday, April 20, 2010

New Website!

Attention, all Yellowhats. My buddy Josh just finished the overhaul on the website. It's a sight better than the old one, and Josh made the navigation and layout much more user-friendly. Thanks, Josh!

If you have any web projects you need done, Josh is the man to do it. Contact me and I'll pass along your info to him. (Don't want to go giving away his email address to complete strangers, you know. Especially the kind of completely strange people that would be reading this site.)

Look for the next issue of "Yellow" to hit newsstands (aka the website) in late June/early July!

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Commentary is Go!

After a couple of reports from people I consider to be rather intelligent that they were unable to figure out how to post on my blog, I did a wee bit of research. Turns out, it was unnecessarily difficult.

No longer!

I changed the settings on the blog and now you no longer have to be a registered user to post comments. Anyone--and I mean anyone (that includes you) can now post their hatred by simply clicking on the "comments" line on the bottom right of each post.

So just to test that it's working, why don't you leave a comment for me right now?

Go ahead. I'll wait.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

New Middles

Well, if you read my last post you know that I've decided to start the latest issue over. That's not really as big a deal as it sounds. I hadn't gotten very far...at all.

I wanted to update you and let you know that I've indeed decided to ditch the digital--at least for the time being--and I've just today broken ground on the re-imagining of Issue #5. I'm a little disappointed that the style is going to change in the middle of an "epi
sode" (That's what I'm calling each 3-issue collection.), but we do what we must.

The good news is that I think this change will be for the better. Not only am I going with a different style, inspired in large part by the great Will Eisner, but in going back to pen & ink I'm also switching to using full-size comic board, rather than the piddly 9"x5" sketch paper I had been using for everything so far.

I had been very adamant about
drawing in that small format for so long because I felt it was how I was at my best. The fact of the matter is, though, I think it was a way to keep myself from having to try harder. But when you've done four issues and everyone still tells you your artwork is the weakest element, it's time to just face facts: You need to be better.

And if I'm going to continue to draw "Yellow" on my own, better is someone I have to be.


So I've set up a drafting table in our until-now-unused home office, and I think having a special spot that's all set up just for my comic will (hopefully) go a long way to making the whole creation process less tedious. I can leave everything out when I am done for the day, and pick it up again at a moment's notice when I can steal a few minutes from the day to work on it.

This is theoretically much better than even having the l
ittle sketchpad, which I could carry around with me, because using that meant that I had to also carry around all my pens/pencils/rulers/sharpeners/erasers/etc., and that's just not convenient.

Above: This is my "Wall of Inspiration." From right to left: An awesome zombie by my friend and someday-collaborator D. Ryan Allen; actress Mira Furlan as Daniel Rousseau on LOST, who actually autographed a page of my comic and hopefully will become a regular customer (see previous post); the man himself, Alan Moore--or at least a cool drawing of him, done by S.P. Burke; and a drawing of Frankenstein's Monster by local comic artist Steve Daniels, of Dark Hopper fame (Thanks, Steve!); There's more, and once I get it all officially put up I'll take another photo.

So my goal still stands: At least two more issues done by March 2011. And with the new set up, the new approach, and the new inspiration I believe I can make it happen!

Saturday, April 3, 2010

Will Eisner, Thanks for the inspiration.




Just got done reading the Contract With God trilogy. Eisner is better than I expected. Much better. His stories seem to be very much grounded in reality, but he really does capture emotion and character excellently. I was under the impression for some reason that his comics were very quaint and G-rated. Not so! I don't know why I thought that, exactly, but it probably has something to do with the time period in which they were made. I guess the 40's and 50's just seems like a much more innocent time, and I think of comics like Peanuts and Archie and stuff.

Anyway, I was pleasantly surprised. Moreover, I decided I need to model my drawing style after Eisner's. I know that saying I want to draw like Eisner is like when I said I want to write like Alan Moore. It's obvious, really. But it gives me some direction. I realized after looking at Eisner's stuff that I had been trying to draw my black and white comic as if it were in color, rather than playing to the strengths of the black/white contrast. I don't even need gray tones, frankly. Just pen and paper.

Anyway, it's given me new hope that I can continue to draw this myself. However, it's also a bit depressing because I might have to start my new issue over completely. But I haven't gotten very far anyway. Just finished my first page the other day, and technically it's not even finished. I think I just feel like after so long I should have more to show for myself than...nothing.

Eh. In the long run it won't be a big deal, and it will be worth it if it means I can create a more consistent and respectable style.

So, next step: Ditch the digital and start over!

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Tweet THIS!

Can't get enough of my dry, almost undetectable wit? Follow me on Twitter. Just search for KSHBob! Then when you find it, click "follow." Then wait for the funny to roll in.

Monday, March 29, 2010

The Big Con

Another year, another successful Planet Comicon.

It was around this time last year that I was wandering around the booths at the Overland Park convention center, wearing my bright yellow "Zombietowne" t-shirt and trying to impress people with my spiral-bound, floppy "Shrinking Universe" trade. I had only a few to give out, and I had to strategically choose my best bets. To other people, I sold t-shirts (or gave them away).

One year later, and so much has changed. Not as much as I'd like, but a little.

I hit up many of the same people I spoke to last year: B. Clay Moore, Daniel Spottswood, Holly Messinger, some tall guy who owns a comic book shop and bought a t-shirt from me to be supportive.

What was great was that most of them remembered me. It helps that I was wearing that same bright yellow t-shirt, so even if they didn't remember me by name they at least knew who I was. It was nice to approach a booth and have the person immediately ask me how my book was coming. I felt almost like one of the gang.

What was even better was that I could show them I had moved up a little in the world. I reached into my bag and pulled out my shiny, professionally printed books and handed them over. I felt much more legitimate, and it was a great ego boost--something I needed at this point in my fledgling career, uncertain if I really had the fortitude to keep going.

As a fan, it was also a very good con.

Actress Mira Furlan was there. She played Danielle Rousseau on my favorite TV show of all time, LOST. (I say "played" because I'm pretty sure she's not going to be in the final season, but we'll see...)

She was a great sport, especially when I asked her for what must've been one of the most unusual autograph requests of her career.

Being the huge LOST fan that I am, it didn't take long into my first issue of "Yellow" that I dropped my first reference to the show. During the introduction to the main character, Quinn Buckley, we hear his high school teacher say

"Continuing our discussion of Enlightenment thinkers, today we'll talk about Jean-Jaques Rousseau. Contrary to what you might think, he was not a crazy woman lost on an island."

Of course, I was referring to Miss Furlan's character (who herself was a reference to the philosopher). I was already excited that she was at the convention, although I had only considered having her sign my copy of the first season of LOST. When I remembered that reference, I became ecstatic.

At the second day of the convention, I approached her with the original page I drew that had that line on it, and asked her to sign it. She understandably wasn't really sure what I was talking about, or what was going on.

"Who is this for?" she said.

"Me. Just me," I replied.

"What are you going to do with it?" she asked.

"Uh, frame it and hang it on my wall for all time," I said back. She laughed and then asked where exactly I wanted it signed. The coolest part was when she stopped as she was starting to write her autograph and looked up and said, "This is really cool." Made my day.

Here's the page with her 'graph:

Photobucket

As a gift, I gave her a t-shirt, which she graciously accepted. And in return, she asked if she could give me a photo of her. I of course said yes, and picked out the coolest one of her as Danielle Rousseau, all dirty and jungle-fied. She signed it and handed it over and that was that. For a while.

Later, when I was getting ready to start thinking about leaving, I came by her table again and held up a copy of my comic.

"Do you have any kids?" I asked.

"Yes," she said.

"Like...over thirteen?"

"Well, eleven."

"My comic is sort of PG-13, with the language."

"Oh, my son is so ready for that. Yeah, he's so ready for that."

So I handed over a copy of "Shrinking Universe" and "Spares." I started to tell her it's about zombies but not really (my usual, awkward, I-Don't-Really-Know-How-To-Summarize pitch). She took one look at the cover of "Spares" and said "Oh, he's going to love this." Then she read the description on the brain jar, and said it again with more emphasis. I think she really meant it. I started to walk away, grinning ear to ear, when I heard her say "This is great." I turned back and she was flipping through the book. "Great use of color," she said. I talked to her about it a little more, briefly, and then left again. I came back a moment later just to let her know that if her son does like it, my contact info was in the back and I'll send him whatever he'd like. I really hope he enjoys it that much. It'd be awesome to have Son-of-Rousseau as a fan!

Also at the con I picked up some LOST action figures, which I'd wanted for a long time. These were all new in the box, and quite reasonably-priced. First it was Charlie, which I got for Emily because that's her favorite character. He was $30, even though Amazon had him listed for $75. After that I went back and bought the other two, Jack and Locke, which were $75 together. (Locke alone, meanwhile, is worth at least $100 in some circles.) All of these figures are from McFarlane Toys, which went bankrupt years ago. They printed two series of LOST figures, and had a third planned. Now, however, no one is making any figures. The guy I bought them from said another company picked up the rights to make toys and has a line of 6-inch figures planned, but as for the McFarlane diorama-style figures I bought--they're already collector's items. I don't know if I'll ever sell them, but I can imagine someday they'll be worth quite a bit of money.

And that's my report from Planet Comicon 2010. Like I said: successful overall. Both as a fan, and as a creator. I don't think I made any new industry contacts per se, but it was a great way to re-energize me and remind me of where I want to be.

My goal for next year is to have my own booth at the con, and to have at least finished my second trade. That only means I have to finish two more issues, including the one I'm currently working on. Two issues in 12 months should be very doable. If I can be partway done with a third by next year's Planet Con, I will be a very happy guy.

Hope to see you there in 2011!

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Robot Rights

I've recently become fascinated (again) with the subject of artificial intelligence, and the future of the technology. Call me crazy, and you probably will, but I often wonder if some of the smart machines we take for granted these days aren't already, on some level, "alive".

After all, many so-called lower organisms, like insects, bacteria--even viruses, for crying out loud--are alive. A virus is barely even complex enough to be called an organism, yet it can apparently think and act of its own accord (or at least according to some internal, pre-programmed drive).

Even people, as apparently complex and sentient as we are, can be boiled down to layer after layer of biological processes. Evolutionist and author Richard Dawkins says we're essentially nothing more than transportation for our genes.

So the next time you turn on your Roomba--full of complex wires and programming--think about it a little bit. Is that little machine, all plastic and metal, really more like a giant, albeit "simple", carpet-cleaning animal? And if so, is it really all that absurd to imagine that at some point someone is going to demand that you treat that animal with respect? After all, there was a time when animals themselves were mistreated regularly, and the thought of "animal rights" was just as absurd as rights for your Roomba.

Think about it.

In the meantime, have a laugh at this paragraph I found in an article on the subject of Robot Rights written in 1985:
By 2010, most new homes will offer a low-cost domestic robot option. This
“homebot” will be a remote-controlled peripheral of a computer brain buried
somewhere in the house. Homebot software will include: (1) applications programs
to make your robot behave as a butler, maid, cook, teacher, sexual companion, or
whatever; and (2) acquired data such as family names, vital statistics and
preferences, a floor map of the house, food and beverage recipes, past family
events, and desired robot personality traits. If a family moves, it would take
its software with it to load into the domestic system at the new house. The new
homebot’s previous mind would be erased and overwritten with the personality of
the family’s old machine.
Funny, right? After your done laughing, become sad, because it only means that in 25 years we'll be looking back at the plans we had today and laughing at how optimistic and naive we were.

For your own unique AI experience, check out Jabberwacky.com. Try to hold a conversation with their resident "chatterbot" and then see if you don't question just what "sentience" really means.

(This post was inspired in part by the guys over at HowStuffWorks.com, who posted an interesting podcast on the subject. Look them up on iTunes and download all the knowledgey goodness.)